Questions have been raised about the possible consequences for Members of Parliament if the All People’s Congress (APC) is suspended by the Political Parties Regulation Commission. Much of the public debate has been driven by fear that such a move could collapse Parliament or create a one-party state. Based on statements made on Truth Media and the framework of Sierra Leone’s laws, those claims do not reflect the legal reality.
The PPRC is a regulatory body that was created to supervise political parties under the Political Parties Act. It is not the executive branch of government and it is not a court. It does not have the authority to dissolve Parliament, dismiss ministers, or remove elected MPs from office. Those powers are governed by the Constitution of Sierra Leone, not by the PPRC Act.
If a political party is administratively sanctioned or suspended for noncompliance, the sanction applies to the party as an organization. It does not automatically remove MPs from their seats. Members of Parliament are elected by voters in their constituencies and hold office under constitutional provisions. Their tenure is not dependent on the continued operational status of their party before the PPRC.
Under the Constitution, an MP may lose his or her seat only under specific conditions. These include resignation, death, disqualification under constitutional criteria, or crossing the floor to join another political party without following the legal process. A regulatory suspension of a party by the PPRC is not listed among those grounds.
The recent discussion on Truth Media clarified several points that have been misunderstood. First, the PPRC cannot declare a one-party state. It does not possess such authority. Second, the matter involving the APC concerns Section 39 of the Political Parties Act, which restricts incendiary or inflammatory political conduct that may threaten public order. Freedom of expression remains protected, but like all constitutional rights, it is subject to lawful limitations.
The PPRC also made clear that the APC has options. The party may pay the administrative fines imposed or challenge the decision in court. That means the principle of due process remains intact. Regulatory action does not eliminate the right to judicial review.
Even in the event of a suspension, government functions would continue. Ministers derive their authority from presidential appointment under the Constitution. Civil servants operate within statutory frameworks. Parliament shall continue without dissolution, save as provided for by constitutional procedures.
In practical terms, a party suspension would restrict the APC from carrying out some key party activities until their compliance issues are resolved. This does not automatically unseat parliamentary occupants or bring legislative activities to an end. MPs continue to represent their constituencies and take part in parliamentary activities, except where a different constitutional issue arises.
The PPRC’s broader point is that political regulation’s purpose is to maintain order and prevent any instability. Many democracies regulate party conduct-the literature on this is vast-so that political competition does not slide into unrest. In itself, the enforcement of regulatory rules does not amount to repression or dismantling democratic institutions.
Read Also: APC Could Be Suspended Tomorrow: See Why
As the situation develops, the legal path chosen by the APC will determine the next phase. What remains clear under Sierra Leone’s constitutional framework is that the status of individual MPs is not automatically erased by administrative action against their party.
