mgid.com, 751172, DIRECT, d4c29acad76ce94f

Salone Messenger

Reading: Sierra Leoneans Demand Clarity on Electricity Sector Debt Amid Claims of Diplomatic Propaganda.
Reading: Sierra Leoneans Demand Clarity on Electricity Sector Debt Amid Claims of Diplomatic Propaganda.

Sierra Leoneans Demand Clarity on Electricity Sector Debt Amid Claims of Diplomatic Propaganda.

Post Views: 902
Abdulai Alusine Shaw
By Abdulai Alusine Shaw 3 Min Read
3 Min Read

Recent developments regarding the financing of Sierra Leone’s energy sector have sparked concerns among citizens, as mounting allegations of “diplomatic propaganda” surface, centered around two key financial commitments: a US$412 million debt for electricity infrastructure and a US$480 million Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) fund. The questions arise over the transparency and legitimacy of these agreements, leading to a public outcry for accountability from both Sierra Leonean officials and their US counterparts.

On June 18, 2024, President Julius Maada Bio, alongside US Ambassador Bryan Hunt and DFC Deputy Head Nisha Biswal, announced a US$412 million debt involving Milele Energy and TCQ Power Limited. This debt, aimed at funding the Western Area Power Generation Project to boost electricity access, raised red flags as no bidding process was made public. Critics, including political analyst and journalist Dr. Chernoh Alpha M. Bah, have since questioned the opaque nature of the deal, highlighting the lack of transparency around the conditions attached to this significant debt.

Adding to the controversy, the US Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) announced a US$480 million compact for the same energy sector. The overlap of these two major financial deals has triggered widespread confusion and skepticism, with citizens questioning how two separate funds could be aimed at the same sector without clear distinction or accountability. Dr. Bah argues that these financial commitments, combined with the country’s accumulating debt—over US$1 billion since 2018—are being imposed through questionable corporate arrangements, further complicating Sierra Leone’s financial future.

Sierra Leoneans are now awaiting detailed responses regarding the difference between the DFC’s debt and the MCC’s fund. The failure to address these concerns, some argue, reflects a broader disregard for transparency and accountability in managing the nation’s critical infrastructure projects. In a nation already burdened by debt and struggling with energy shortages, this controversy threatens to undermine public trust in both local and international institutions involved in the sector.

As calls for accountability grow louder, citizens demand not only clearer communication but also genuine efforts toward the development of Sierra Leone’s energy infrastructure, free from the shadow of diplomatic deception.

#Accountability

#EnergyCrisis

#SierraLeone

Stay Updated

Share this Article